Originated and encouraged by Edas God (Edas Dei), through the learning, of the experience, of successive voluntary, conscious and responsible elections, each one goes building his/heir own ethical conscience. This way the: “¿how should we act?”, it comes off the call “the voice of the conscience”, as moral reflection that accompanies all man at every moment and circumstance.
The conscience that is being spoken itself, in psychological terms, is the evolutionary process by means of which an individual forms his own scale of values, that will take him to approve or to disapprove his present behavior and to decide his future behavior.
The base of the ethical conscience is the freedom, which is not a gift but a conquest of the will amid the subjective conditionings; physiologic and psychological, and the objective conditionings; theological, economic, social, cultural, political and educational ones.
The ethical conscience is the assertion that “everyone ought to be respect in his autonomy”, that takes us to the conception from the respect to the “human dignity” that is measured not by the man's selfish actions to get its own purposes, but for the disinterested actions and the respect to the duty, that they transform them into the person's properly moral actions that is who carries out the intentional acts and like person determines a moral behavior, since executes conscious acts directed to a purpose, with will, freedom and responsibility.
Moral behavior obeys an axiological scale of absolute and transcendent character of values that they should always be the same ones and if there is a change it belongs to the historical man that alters its respective order; there are periods of secularization and others of holliness, taking turns the sacred and the profane things.
By the “principle of the beneficence”, as the duty to make the goodness or “primun non nocere”; first of anything not to harm, the value of a moral fact is measured by the kindness or wickedness. The kindness is always acting in the sense of “that each one is being perfected oneself and offer and help equally to that the other ones also make it. It is the will to understand oneself and to understand the other ones. That is the road to reach the peace and the blessedness in the further on. It is the state of conscientious tranquility that defines the destination post-morten.
The traditional norms that spread equally to the perfection and that repeatedly has been used by the religions; as “love to the neighbor”; “to be loved those some to the other ones”; “not to make to other that you do not want that they make to you”; “to work so that the person and other people reach its end and not to use to the other ones as means”; “not to kill”, etc., they are forms of expressing the ethical conscience.
According to the modern psychology, “in the individual there is a deficit of being that it is never satisfied”, the psychoanalysis teaches us that in the “life’s world” only it becomes to be completed when it wishes nothing, reality that carries out entirely in the Almighty in his infinite perfection, but not in the man, because if it is related to the love as a never satisfied desire, it becomes him in a non completed being.
The ethical norm should be “to love the neighbour on all the things”, and not to the divinity since God does not need it, that he imprinted it in the human nature, for the humans and among humans and alone for the humans.
By the “principle of autonomy”; that is the capacity of everyone to govern himself by a norm that he accepts himself such as, without extern coercion, the perfection as a virtue, is to execute the ethical reflection to find the truth and to give it the due recognition. For that reason we should take fully communion with the Message like theological reality, that perfects us when we recognize the transcendent being in Edas God, (Edas Dei) that full us with moral sense, that we find the sense from the life when carrying out the values that emanate of its image, that with the knowledge of the science that we dispose at the moment, let us develop a new functional ethical conscience functional ethics in expansion that overcomes the Judeo-Christian traditional one.
¿Does it have the ethical conscience something that to see with the conflict between religion and science?
¡If the contains of the faith is based essentially on the “mystery”, at last it can finish being a fraud!
¿Then, will it be logical to accept the syncretism that unites the faith with the reason?
¿Will the ethical conscience be fail, if the faith is taken as a point of reference to give sense to the life?
The religion is belief and the science is knowledge. One can believe in something without being fully sure of it, which is to say that we believe it is true nevertheless it can be false. It can happen that people are so fully convinced of the supposed truth of their beliefs like of the truth that they do not know, although such beliefs are false.
To know something is to respond for its truth with guarantee and ethics, because not alone it is necessary to be convinced that the truth is possessed, but it is necessary to prove that that is the true, in fact that is known should be true. The necessary conditions and enough to know something are: that that known is true, that we are sure of it, that we have right to be sure.
Then it is not easy to conciliate what we have pointed out like a contrast between the knowledge and the belief. In fact they are two diametrically opposed and unyielding methodologies. It is the contradiction and inexorable and irreconcilable separation between the faith wisdom and reason wisdom. Understood this way, it will never be able to have the reduction and union between science and revealed religion, because their epistemological methods are incompatible, although phenomenally in some aspects one thing explains the other one.
The Message accepts what the science says and it is identified with the law of the evolution, it discards the revelation, the miracle, the anthropomorphic conception of the divine thing, and the unlikely belief of the divine incarnation that is something inconceivable in a deity that goes against its substantial form of being infinite reduced to the finite thing.
The new ethics of the Message does not take communion and it condemns the theory, represented by the Renaissance Maquiavelo, according to which “the end justifies the means”, of so terrible consequences to justify any action and that so much suffering has caused the humanity, that applied to the political ideal, it means to use the cruel force to reach the power, to conserve it and to safeguard the State.
The human nature is dual because it is governed by antagonistic principles and in its more intimate being consists on the unstable coexistence of opposed forces; the active ones that cannot exist without the reactive ones, forming an unit of forces in conflict, whose resolution like voluntary act and of free will determines a moral behavior. This human duality represents in the West the spirit Apolineo and Dionisiaco of the Greek tragedy and in the East the theory of the Yang; the light, and the Yin; the shade.
The “principle of the epikeia”, or of the equity, it is supreme ethical norm of all the human acts and as a feeling of justice and ponderaction of judgments and performances, it solves the situations outlined by the human duality.
In the nature everything is matter and energy and the spiritual energies do not exist, opposed forces that determine an energy flow exist. The human improvement as ethical command of the Message is related with the energy. The search of the maximum use of the Available Energy is ethical norm of all human action that is achieved by those "conscientious states" connected with the spiritual power.
The mysterious relationship between the “Spiritual Potency” and the “Available Energy” is impregnated by the" ethical sense", since there it moves hidden forces that the esoteric affair in its diverse forms tries to know, since it is wisdom of immense value in the modern world where the biggest battle that struggles is for the control of the human minds.
The edista ethical is the theory of the moral valuation of the human acts for the taking advantage of it is made in the use of the human energy. It is explained by the axiological scale of values that through the conscience it regulates the active and reactivate forces of each one. The human energy that is to our disposition and that we should take advantage to the maximum it is due to the action of these forces.
To make the goodness is to share with the neighbor the knowledge of the positive and human sciences, that allow the man the domain of himself and of the forces of the nature.
The human being is governed by the dharma; that is the precept to complete, for the karma; that is the law of cause and effect, and for which our acts follow us, that is the cause law to effect and for which our acts follow us, according to which the nirvana is or not reached, that is the state of eternal happiness in the further on.
The dharma of the edista ethics is based on the principle of: “doing good things, of personal autonomy, and of justice for the human improvement”, that is related morally with the domain that the spiritual power of our conscience exercises on the active, and reactive forces, that makes that our Available Energy is divided in Useful Energy and Degraded Energy. The well is all that allows the maximum use of the available energy and the evil is all that opposes to it.
Man and woman be perfecting according to apply the ethics principles to reach the maximum yield of human energies.