Universal Religious Congregation - (C.R.U.)
Social Network Icono Twitter Icono Facebook


Since the time of the Neolithic the mystery religions like those of Egypt and Greece paved the way to Christianity, and in its most radical formulation, Christianity is most successful mystery Eastern religion, the Catholic sacramen- tal system being a derivation of the pagan practices of the mystery cults."

Christianity is thus an amalgam of elements mithraic (such as ritual feast, that precedes the Eucharist), metroacos (the taurobolium as predecessor of the baptism) or isíacos (the passion and death of Osiris that is identified as the source of the passion and death of Christ). The similarity of vocabulary is used as a test irrefutable of the dependency of the Christianity of the cults mystery, and this terminology form part of all the religious contemporary environment."

The Christianity use their Pagan inheritance, since from them centuries IV and V, see representations of the Virgin with the child in arms, to similarity of Isis with the infante Harpocrates in his lap. Since the Marian cult is not based on the Gospels had to draw iconographic symbolism on other contemporary female deities who enjoyed great veneration, mainly of the cult of Isis."

In the evolution of the religious thought, the Christianity is built on Jesus' teachings, as that of the "love to the neighbor" and "you do not want for other, that you do not want for you", recaptured of that centuries ago taught Confucius and that they are a legacy of the Chinese wisdom. Also, the doctrine and moral of Buddha offers curious likeness with that those centuries later Jesus exposes. The Christianity was born like a sect of the Judaism, later Paul of Tarso, call the apostle of the heathens, inverted the primitive foundations when converting Jesus, to who knew never, in "son of the  Yahweh god of the Jews."

Brahman is the being or supreme reality that saves and transcends to the Hindu trinity to make supposedly intelligible and rational. The Christianity takes in very slight form the elements of the Hindu trinity in its desire of giving to Jesus divine character, but it forgot to include a Brahman in its Christian trinity that makes impossible to understand the absurdity of making believe that three are similar to one, that it does not save neither even applying the theorem of Kart Gödel, of that is this way and is not this way. 

The Christianity originates in the time of diverse ideas of Messiah that they mark the old cultures of the century I of our era in that the Messianic heroes swarm, which have as common characteristic to be Gnostics; possessors of a corpus of beliefs native of Asia that fuses with the Hellenism and the Judaism, and that corresponds in our days to that is designated with the name of mysticism.
 The essence of the gnosis is the search of the transcendental knowledge through the illumination to rise on the passions and earthly desires, looking for the goal of the realization in a certain belief and in the contemplation of God.

 The Gnostic thematic of that time moves in the man's ascension toward God and in the descent of God to the Messiah. Its esotericism is expressed by means of parables that represent the echoes of the Greek religion. The creation of the myth is born of the hope and the belief in an active divinity that ends inexorably in the creation of an extraordinary character for general rule of demidivine origin, in this case the Messiah. To create the catharsis and to force god to intervene, is necessary an extraordinary sacrifice that brings forth the hero. All the myths are born this way, the obliged hero is a man son of a god and a human.

 The hero is by definition no understanding and all his good actions will be worth him so alone the ingratitude of the men, being translated here in the fundamental topic of the gnosis, nobody understands that he says; it finishes this way to kill him or he dies in celestial combat and then he acquires the immortality, serving as celestial lighthouse for the humanity and making up so the Gnostic cycle.

 Jesus' historical fact is explained this way, because the gnosis impregnated all Palestine, and the esenios that were his teachers they followed the same outline, in such a way he could not avoid the Gnostic current, since all his behavior coincides with that of the Gnostics.

 The Christianity is built on the teachings and Jesus' adorned image, which has been object of continuous manipulations along the centuries, based on the canonical gospels that describe his figure, presenting flagrant contradictions when being formed by a mosaic of other strange  fragments, often repeated just as they figured in the original beliefs, since Jesus like Socrates and Buddha did not leave anything written.

 If Jesus really died in the cross together with the two thieves and he was buried with them in the same place or in the same grave, then he was not found in the sepulcher waited by Marie Magdalena his wife, who had a daughter with him according to the gospel of Judas, and with other people that accompanied her, that made them to give the good one new of his resurrection that later became in legend.

 The New Testament is the sacred book of the Christianity written in Greek language many years after the existence of Jesus, which contemplates that the tradition in old Greek transmitted of supposedly he built in his life and of which said that he said, since he did not leave anything written, and that he really made, taught, and said in his Aramaic language nobody knows.

 Before this situation the salomonic solution was the invention and creation of the Holy Spirit the day of Pentecost, to make believe that from then on, with its divine gifts it has lit its followers, to give them the freedom of giving loose rein to its imagination making all kinds of statements, assigning them optional sacred character, on that that supposedly Jesus said, because all that is known about him was “by hearsaid in Aramaic and after in Greek language ” and written many years after his death.

 It is considered as the largest swindle in the history of mankind what happened at the Council of Nicaea in the year 323, organized, financed and supervised by the Emperor Constantine, to strengthen his political power with the support of the Christians to unify his empire. There the priest Arrio defended the thesis that Jesus as man cannot be God by nature, denying his divinity, against the opposite thesis of Alexander of Alexandria, who as an advocate and friend of the Emperor, supported his political, military and economic power, so his thesis was imposed on the priest Arrio´s one, who was an exponent and defender of the authentic original primitive Christianity. In this Council the fantasy was imposed on reality, the Paul´s doctrine of Jesus son of God over early Christianity, for whom Jesus was not more than a creature, although very lofty and eminent, so, Catholic Church was born from this apostasy.

Then, before the previous conjuncture is necessary to give Jesus' real image, based on historical analysis, deductions and reconstructions to understand the religious phenomenon that he impelled. According to the Manuscripts of the Dead Sea discovered in 1949, the structure and teachings of Jesus preceded him, because he took them of the masters of the esenia community of Qumran, which means this sect was born fifty years before our era and that disappeared with the place of Massada before the century I, it had the responsibility of the transmission of the beliefs of the Judaism to the Christianity.

 The primitive Christians read besides the four canonical gospels of the New Testament, thirty one gospels, which were retired of the circulation for an gelesiano ordinance in the century V, for decision of the religious authorities that followed the opinion of San Jerome. In the Tomas' gospel found in the High Egypt, in Nag Hamodi, in 1945, indicates that there was in Jesus' immediate environment among its successors, an exemplary Gnostic that questioned the dogma of the incarnation.

 The canonical gospels have made an effort in giving Jesus the fated and naturally David’s origin of the Messiah. In the face of the inability of coming to an agreement about who was the source of his royal ancestry among the David’s sons, mention to Joseph in an almost forced way as the necessary image, but lacking of life that is used with the only object of providing Jesus a David’s origin. The same gospels declare that Joseph did not participate some in Jesus' conception that invalidates a priori his capacity already doubtful, of acting as  David’s link. Besides Herod the Big one, eliminated the genealogies of all the Jewish families, to put finish to any dynastic pretense and in this respect is necessary to score that in the execution of this order there is not rake some that a slaughter has been made of newly born ones, because all the acts of Herod the Big one was studied minutely and they registered the events of his reign and a fact this way could not happen inadvertent. The compassionate invention of the famous slaughter of newly born ones perpetrated by Herod the Big; is dedicated to support the idea of Jesus' regal origin.

 Everything seems to indicate that Joseph was a priest and Mary, mother of Jesus, she also belonged to a family of priests that according to the Jewish habit, very strict to this respect, alone he could marry a priest. According to James’ protogospel, Mary was orphan and she determined Jesus' historical existence.

 The gospels, canonical or not, they lack interest when specifying this fact, and they take refuge in the pure myth arguing that Jesus' personality is immaterial, that is to say divine.

 The existence of Jesus as a person who was born without a biological father, which made resurrect the dead, that he died and resurrected and that he raise to heaven with his material body, turns out to be a whole scientific impossibility.

 If he was killed and resurrected why did not say how is the another life, if he ascended to heaven he could not do so with his material body because in the spiritual world there may not be anything material, therefore his corpse should stand in any one place on Earth.

 The Jesus´ case that we have historically tried to convert him in God, means God would lose the attribute of divine being and he would become a finite being. God is infinite being and cannot ever be passed to be a finite being because he would be not God. For that reason is impossible to consider Jesus being god.

 Joseph, father of Jesus, left Jerusalem and traveled with his son to the Egypt of the Pharaohs regarded as the land of secrets, where as reads in the Talmud talking about Jesus, he had made start in Egypt in the mysteries, what is sufficient to explain to his eyes the power that attributed him the Gospels with respect to heal the sick and raise the dead.

 The personality of Jesus is determined by Joseph, who instilled in him first religious notions at his early age this teaching was decisive in their convictions, and to a greater extent, because Jose had belonged to a strict sect of the Nazarenes, which prepared Jesus to enter later in the equally rigorous and apocalyptic teaching own the esenio novitiate and prepare him to enter in the temple where the child was subjected to the traditional examination against the doctors of the law.

 There is Jesus' partial ideological debt with the esenios that represented a decisive paper in the structuring of his teachings. The supreme indifference with regarding the Kingdom of the matter, the wait of the imminent coming of the Kingdom of God and the systematic practice of the baptism for the purification of the sins of the body and of the spirit, they are three heterodox Jewish beliefs that they appear in Jesus' teachings.

Jesus was the rebel who had abandoned Qumran, before the Babylonian accumulation of rites that the esenios imposed his pupils, and with his conquering impulse he had undertaken the Gnostic road of a public life that had not been more than a web of betrayals, misunderstandings and intrigues. He had tried to open up for their people the road toward a God different to that divine, vengeful and warring power that maintained the tradition through the books of the Old Testament. He fought to demolish the inextricable wall of rites, prescriptions and prohibitions, reflected in the 637 commandments of the Talmud, care with great zeal for a clergy to maintain its power.

 It is unimaginable that could feel a man that, from the cross, he had directed to his Celestial Father that awful scream ¿why hast thiu forsaken me? for dominate that had to seem him as a terrible failure. But Jesus possessed the enough strength before anyone that was the bitterness of the failure, because could not renounce of the esenic teaching based on the immense opening from the being to the divinity and his brethren the men. Now after his passion, his pilgrimage indicated him a port to go aboard outside of Palestine and to disappear forever.

Jesus was victim of a Jewish and historical misunderstanding, because everybody, his contemporaries and successors wanted to transform him into a Messiah, although neither a single time he has said that he was it, but he was aware of the paper that he accepted to impose him and he supported to impose the topic Gnostic of the man's ascension in turn toward God.

The posteriority would take charge exactly otherwise, the descent of God to the Messiah, to grant him Son's of God title, closing the Gnostic cycle and giving this way origin to a religion erected on the foundations of an enigmatic character whose teachings and true identity are interwoven among the threads of the exegesis, the historical analysis, the philology, the tradition, and the theses according to which Jesus was not more than a myth, because the spiritual persistence of the ancestors that they have lived a long time ago and that did not perceive them in their true terrestrial reality, that they are wrapped by a layer so thick of mythological beliefs, they finish losing their natural personality to become divinities, even happening that they have been product of an invention.

 But, it is the comparison of Paul's epistles with the materials found in Qumrán and The Acts of the Apostles, that confirms that Paul with his apparent wealth, his Roman citizenship and his natural familiarity with the reining system, was imposed before James brother of Jesus, under his principle of the supremacy of the faith he relegated to God establishing the cult for the first time to Jesus, making of him an equivalent species of Adonis of Tammus, of Attis or any other of the gods that died and they revived and they populated the Half East of that epoch.

 To be able to compete with those divine rivals, Jesus had to equal them in each point and miracle, and is in this stage where they associate to his biography the miraculous elements including his supposed birth of a virgin and his resurrection among the dead ones, that are above all Pauline inventions to transform the man into god like support of the religious propaganda in his proselytizing trips.

 The scientific investigation carried out on the nature and the physiology of mental disorders, it shows that there is in the mystic world deliriums of greatness that they are false beliefs regarding the power and the person's importance, as the conviction that the person possesses divine powers or that he/she has a special knowledge that nobody has or that he/she is related with some deity, that which can take to the untidy thought of her followers and multiplier its effects of hallucinations and deliriums.

 For that reason in the archaeological evolution, the tracking of the Rolls of the Dead Sea faces us with the contradiction between the Jesus of the history and the Christ of the faith, and anyway looking at it from this perspective understands that the drama of the Christianity is solved, not in the mystified figure of the one that learned how to be the Messiah like one of the pupils of the Esenia Sect, but in the monastery of the Qumran that is the cradle of the fundamentalist Christianity and in the corresponding attitude of the churches like human organizations that are, so that they despoil of their mystic and Aristotelian robe and recognize and show that in the artifice of the principle of Paul's supremacy, rests the contradictory nature of their theological dogmatism and the sense and effectiveness of their faith, engage in myths that have gone already losing for the people its sense, because, the Christianity has always been officialzed by a church always willing to make a pact with the same Devil, with such of conserving its privileges and the acquired patrimony after centuries of inquisitorial power